Mga Serbisyong Pang-korporasyon para sa Iyong Negosyo sa Singapore
WhatsApp
WeChat⌄
Apex Gateway WeChat QR code

I-scan upang makipag-ugnayan sa amin sa WeChat

Mobile: +65 8585 9090Email: info@acggroupsg.com
Regulations & Compliance · PDF

Accountants (Amendment) Act 2022: Reviews, Sanctions and Standards

Act 32 of 2022 introduces entity quality-control and AML/CFT reviews, differentiates practice-monitoring outcomes and sets sanction limits, procedural safeguards and transition rules.

Source checked · 11 October 2026 Historical document

Enacted instrument and commencement

The 49-page Gazette Act was passed on 3 October 2022, assented to on 25 October and published on 4 November. Section 1 leaves commencement to a Ministerial Gazette notification; publication itself is not the commencement date. This article explains the amending Act rather than a later consolidated Accountants Act. Its reforms cover public accountants and accounting corporations, firms and LLPs, and make consequential terminology changes to the Banking Act.

Professional standards and regulatory responsibilities

Improper conduct expressly includes breach of the prescribed professional conduct and ethics code. The Act clarifies the practice monitoring programme, practice review and reviewer, and defines professional standards as prescribed standards, methods, procedures and requirements. The Oversight Committee assists ACRA on AML/CFT and standards and administers entity reviews, while gaining powers to prescribe ethics and the Second Schedule’s auditing/reporting and quality-control categories. A public accountant undergoing practice monitoring must pay prescribed administration fees; the former wording requiring successful passage of reviews is removed.

Partially satisfactory versus unsatisfactory practice reviews

Where compliance is partially satisfactory, the Committee may require satisfactory completion of remediation, practice-improvement steps, undertakings or other improvement orders. Unsatisfactory compliance can lead to cancellation, suspension up to two years or refusal to renew registration. Instead of cancellation/suspension/non-renewal, or alongside suspension, it may impose service restrictions up to two years, remediation, improvements, undertakings and notification of relevant affected clients. The Committee can send the client notification if the accountant fails to do so, and can revise improvement orders for changed circumstances or good reason.

Breached practice orders and individual procedural safeguards

Breach of an improvement order can result in cancellation, suspension up to two years or non-renewal; suspension can be combined with specified further improvement orders. The Registrar serves orders. For the serious orders specified in section 38(2)(a), (5), (6) and (7), the accountant must have an opportunity to show cause. They take effect at the latest of one month after service, the specified effective date, or the day after an appeal is determined/withdrawn. Appeal to the General Division of the High Court is within 30 days of service or an extension allowed by that court, whose decision is final.

Refusal to undergo practice monitoring

Section 38A permits suspension up to two years for refusal without reasonable excuse, with the accountant bearing the burden of proving the excuse. Refusal includes explicit rejection, denying reasonable daytime access to practice premises, failing to meet specified information requirements within 14 days, preventing inspection/copying and failing to respond to a monitoring notice within 14 days or an allowed longer period. The provision applies only to monitoring required on or after commencement of this amending Act. The latest-date effectiveness and 30-day High Court appeal safeguards apply.

New Part 5A and independent oversight

Part 5A establishes entity quality-control reviews and AML/CFT reviews of entities and individual practitioners. Entity means accounting corporation, firm or LLP; practitioners include the relevant corporate practitioners or firm partners/employees practising as public accountants. For Part 5A, public-accountant members are excluded from the Oversight Committee and must not influence its functions or decisions directly or indirectly. ACRA may appoint another non-public-accountant member to chair Part 5A business. Review participation can be a condition of continuing entity approval; the entity pays prescribed fees, including for its individual practitioner’s AML/CFT review.

Entity reviewers’ powers and legal privilege

ACRA employees or other suitably qualified individuals may be appointed entity reviewers. They follow Committee procedures and regulatory instructions. Entities and relevant practitioners must produce or provide access to reasonably relevant records within reasonably required time/place, explain records, supply readable reproductions and give reasonably available assistance. Reviewers may inspect, copy or extract documents and must produce appointment evidence on request. Legally privileged communications to or from legal practitioners are protected. Reviewers submit final and requested interim reports to the Registrar, who reports partially satisfactory/unsatisfactory quality control or AML/CFT breaches to the Committee.

Entity quality control: remedies and penalty calculation

Partially satisfactory quality control permits remediation, improvement steps, undertakings and other improvement orders. Unsatisfactory compliance can revoke approval or suspend services up to two years. Alternatives, or additions to suspension, include restrictions up to two years and a penalty capped at the lower of S$250,000 and 5% of audit turnover for the 12 months ending at the previous financial year-end before review began. Audit turnover means gross revenue from auditing and reporting on financial statements. Remediation and undertakings remain available. Breached non-penalty orders can lead to revocation, suspension or the same capped penalty; where the original order already included a penalty, the specified further remedies exclude another penalty under section 38H(7).

AML/CFT entity and practitioner sanctions differ

Entity AML/CFT breaches may revoke approval or suspend services up to 12 months, with alternative/additional restrictions up to 12 months, censure and up to S$25,000 per breach. Individual practitioner breaches may cancel registration or suspend it up to 12 months, with alternative/additional restrictions up to 12 months, censure and up to S$10,000 per breach. Breaching a restriction order can lead to revocation/cancellation or suspension; specified restriction/censure orders can accompany that suspension. The Committee may revise alternative orders for changed circumstances or good reason. These AML/CFT limits differ from the entity quality-control penalties.

Penalty recovery, non-payment and hearings

Entity quality-control and entity/individual AML/CFT penalties are recoverable as debts due to ACRA. Failure to pay by the effective date can trigger revocation/cancellation or suspension up to 12 months without displacing debt recovery. Serious revocation, cancellation, suspension and penalty orders under these provisions require an opportunity to show cause. They take effect at the latest of one month after service, the specified date and the day after appeal determination/withdrawal. Appeals are to the High Court’s General Division within 30 days of service or a court-allowed extension; its decision is final. The Act does not attach this same appeal wording indiscriminately to every remedial or censure order.

Refusal of entity review and attributed practitioner refusal

An entity refusing quality-control or AML/CFT review without reasonable excuse can be suspended up to two years, with the entity bearing the excuse burden. A practitioner’s refusal counts as the entity’s refusal only where its consent, connivance or neglect is proved. Examples include express refusal, blocking reasonable daytime premises access, not meeting record/readable-copy requirements within 14 days, obstructing inspection and not responding to written review notices within 14 days or an allowed extension. The Act sets comparable practitioner examples. Latest-date effectiveness and 30-day High Court appeals apply to the entity suspension.

Disciplinary cap, suspension advertising and aggregate periods

The Act increases the section 53(2)(d) disciplinary penalty reference from S$100,000 to S$250,000 and moves authority to extend section 54 appeal time to the High Court. Suspended accountants must not practise, hold themselves out or advertise as authorised public accountants for the suspension period. Suspended entities cannot provide services or advertise authorised status; corporations also cannot use Public Accounting Corporation wording, derivatives or the PAC suffix for that period. Subsequent suspension orders issued before the preceding suspension expires must, together with the original order, not exceed two years in aggregate; this concerns a continuing chain, not a lifetime cap.

External standards, schedules and publication

ACRA may make rules on AML/CFT, ethics outside Committee-assigned matters and standards outside the Second Schedule; the Committee may prescribe the ethics code and scheduled audit/reporting and quality-control standards. Both can adopt external professional-accountancy material wholly/partly, with/without modifications, at a fixed date or as amended over time. Adopted material forms part of the rules/orders, and later amendments form part unless otherwise provided. Gazette notices must identify adoption/amendment dates and free inspection/obtaining arrangements, plus other access routes. ACRA can amend either Schedule with Ministerial approval; rules can provide publication of specified decisions/orders.

Savings and consequential amendments

Renewal applications submitted before the appointed commencement day retain the old section 13(3)(b). Existing reviewers continue as practice reviewers until their appointments end. Reviews begun before commencement generally retain old Part 5, with reviewer terminology updated. Pre-commencement complaints or referred information retain old section 53 penalty and section 54 appeal rules for resulting disciplinary proceedings. The Minister may make additional transitional/saving regulations for two years after each provision commences. Cross-references extend suspension/disqualification provisions to Part 5A, and Banking Act references change reviewer to practice reviewer.

Official source

This article independently explains the substantive contents of the official PDF, including the relevant conditions, procedures and annexes. The linked document remains the authoritative source for its original wording, and later changes should be checked separately.

Read the official PDF ↗
Makipag-ugnayan para sa konsultasyon
Makipag-ugnayan